
His parents wed in 1953 before moving to Sarajevo, where they lived on modest means in adapted housing at the old Sarajevo train station as his father was employed in the state-run ŽTP railway company. Vojislav Šešelj was born in Sarajevo, PR Bosnia and Herzegovina, FPR Yugoslavia, to Nikola Šešelj (1925–1978) and Danica Šešelj (née Misita 1924–2007), Serbs from the Popovo Valley region of eastern Herzegovina. Šešelj was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but because of time already spent in ICTY custody, he was not obligated to return to prison.

He was found not guilty on the remaining counts of his indictment, including all the war crimes and crimes against humanity that he was alleged to have committed in Croatia and Bosnia. On 11 April 2018, the Appeals Chamber partially reversed the first-instance verdict, finding Šešelj guilty of crimes against humanity for his role in instigating the deportation of Croats from Hrtkovci.

The acquittal was appealed by prosecutors from the MICT, a United Nations Security Council agency which functions as oversight program of, and successor entity to, the ICTY.

On 31 March 2016, he was acquitted in a first-instance verdict on all counts by the ICTY. He led the SRS in the 2016 elections, and his party won 23 seats in the parliament. He did not call any witnesses in his defense.Īfter spending 11 years and 9 months in detention in the United Nations Detention Unit of Scheveningen during his trial, Šešelj was permitted to temporarily return to Serbia in November 2014 to undergo cancer treatment.
#Seselj knjige pdf trial#
Šešelj's trial was marred with controversy: he went on hunger strike for nearly a month until finally being allowed to represent himself, regularly insulted the judges and court prosecutors once proceedings commenced, disclosed the identities of protected witnesses and was penalized on three occasions for disrespecting the court. He voluntarily surrendered to the ICTY in February 2003 but his trial did not begin until November 2007. Between 19, he served as the deputy prime minister of Serbia. In addition, it highlights the importance of critical source evaluation in the analysis of controversial historical events.Vojislav Šešelj ( Serbian Cyrillic: Војислав Шешељ, pronounced born 11 October 1954) is a Serbian politician, founder and president of the far-right Serbian Radical Party (SRS) he was convicted of war crimes by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). This article adds the Partisans' perspective to the episodes, thus contributing to a more complete picture of clashes that cost both Danish and Yugoslav lives. As a result, a number of misunderstandings and factual errors concerning the events became repeated in the latest scholarly work. Narratives were developed in almost complete isolation from sources and literature in the region of former Yugoslavia. Unfortunately, western scholarship has largely been restricted to memoirs by former Waffen-SS soldiers and a few reports from German military units. The events have attracted interest among Danish scholars as well as in popular literature. Both took place in a small area of the so-called Independent State of Croatia. On 23–25 November 1943, Regiment Dänemark of the 11 th SS-freiwilligen Panzer-Grenadier-Division " Nordland " became involved in two cases of local combat with Yugoslav Partisans. The events in Yugoslavia in the 1990s resemble in parts to what has been described as hybrid warfare in Ukraine in 2014–2017. With the recent development of Russian international politics, it is of interest to revisit Yugoslavia and discuss the lessons learnt there in the light of hybrid warfare. Main actors as for example Slobodan Milošević and Franjo Tudjman are also presented in this chapter. Some actors are chosen as examples for the purpose of theoretical explanation, even though there are others to focus on if one wants a complete historical account. The intention and overall description in these few pages will help provide an example of the practical application of a field theory perspective to conflict, rather than describing the conflict in full.

We also follow a short account of the events leading up to war in the Balkans, in particular in Bosnia. The French sociologist and theorist Pierre Bourdieu is also introduced here. It also give some examples of what have been done before in this matter, specifically the concept Effect-Based Operations (EBO). This bookdeals with why social theory can be relevant in the context of military operations.
